Memnoch
Moderators
Whoda Thunkit?
Posts: 204
|
Post by Memnoch on Jul 8, 2013 19:27:13 GMT -11
Maybe this is light talk, maybe not so light...but as I got tired I go back a few days when a friend removed me from FB. Normally I wouldn't give a shit, I've lost 2 former best friends, 1 being a former roomie, over stupid shit on FB...no biggie. Well, this person wasn't just a close friend, but certainly up there on people I have a lot of respect for (which means as much to me as friendship). Not going to go into the whole thing, but I believe what pushed her over the edge was me getting upset about women who say that since a man can't have an abortion he should have no opinion.
To me saying that someone shouldn't be able to have thoughts on something because of their gender is by definition, sexist. Imagine if I said a woman's opinion didn't matter because she was a woman...doesn't matter the topic. It adds an additional layer of bullshit because they don't tell guys who agree with them the same thing...it isn't about gender, it is a bullshit argument used to shut up your opposition. Thing is I haven't talked to her since...I want to get in touch with her, but not until I can discuss this without the emotion. It has been a week. Well, next week is a party and we will both be there. I need to resolve this before then, but it is still driving me crazy.
Feel free to respond...or not...I just needed to get this off my chest as I need to be up in 5 hours.
|
|
Draco
Theme Mods
Posts: 273
|
Post by Draco on Jul 8, 2013 20:22:34 GMT -11
To say a man shouldn't have an opinion is to disregard his process of dealing with the situation. This isn't healthy, especially if the man is the father. Abortion is hard on men to, they just dont talk about it. Is it as traumatic for them? Maybe not... I think it really depends on who we are talking about. It's usually safe to assume its more trumatic for women but why go there? It's hard for everyone.
Having an opinion and being an influence are two different things though. Personally if it's not your child I don't thing you should be the one making that decision. With fathers; should they have a say? I think that when you make the choice to be intimate with someone you choose to be influenced by their process and so you need to here them out. Ultimately though I do think the female should have of a say and since there's no third party to affect the leverage... it comes down to the mother to make that choice.
I do think there is a legal and ethical question of whether or not the father should have to raise the child if he did not not want the child or if he made this very clear prior to intercourse. However what validity this argument has is countered by the fact that the child in no way could have consent to such an agreement and therefore could not have given up their parental protection as defined by law.
We can't deny that men are affected here, that would be naive. It goes both ways to, sometimes the father wants to be a father and the mother does not. You always wonder who that son or daughter would have been. So I believe it perfectly valid to not only have an opinion but to ask these questions.
That said, my personal values on how to handle the situation are informed by my native background. Women are head of the houshould, or better put, the family atmosphere. The children are of their mothers clan, not the fathers. It is the mothers clan who takes care of them. That is not to say the father doesn't help- those are your children of course you help but according to clan law he wouldn't be required to; and he would also have responsibilities to his own clan.
This might seem sexist but I do see wisdom in it. If my wife or partner were pregnant I would not feel it were my place to challenge her decision nor would I want to strongly influence her in such a vulnerable state as she would be swayed from her own inner guidance. However, just because I would not attempt to influence her does not mean she should not be aware of me and what I am going through. It is hard for one not to interfere and still be seen but it's what you have to do. Working together does not stop after intercourse and regardless of the decision it best to go though it together. The male may be taking a passive role at this time but he still has a role. Yielding to the females wisdom at this time- part of her wisdom is recognize the role he plays in her own process and how that role is for him, also an initiation. He is also vulnerable at this time, not unlike the child growing in her womb.
Communication is what starts the situation and it's the key to getting through it- but while involuntary communicate starts it, it takes awareness to get though it. To talk about it with someone you aren't intimate with, well it still take empathy. Without empathy, there wont be any real understanding of shoes that person is in and if you don't know the situation you are ill-equipped to influence it any healthy way.
A women who disregards the feelings of men, is known in any culture to be a bitch. However, you wouldn't be losing sleep over her if you didn't care about her and what she might be going through right now. If you weren't aware of that then; perhaps her reaction wasn't uncalled for.
Just some thoughts, for whatever their worth.
|
|
Graphite
Moderators
The Big Bad
Trimming fat
Posts: 453
|
Post by Graphite on Jul 8, 2013 20:29:35 GMT -11
From her point of view it can very well feel more like someone is infringing on the individuals right to have a medical procedure rather than sexism. Yes, pregnancy is bio gender specific. Yes, because of this so is abortion. Is it sexism? No. Is the decision to have a medical procedure up to the individual? Yes. Is it unfair? Hell yes.
If I want to have a biological child I am forced to go through 10 months of my life belonging to someone else, my life being dictated by something else or I have to pay a surrogate and a fertilization clinic huge amounts of money and go through medical procedures. A man has to spurt in the right hole, or cup, at the right time. That is unfair.
In terms of discussing something that biologically is a medical procedure only one biological gender can have done to them I do believe it is up to the people of the biological gender in question to have the voice on that. Having ones ethical beliefs extend to the individual rights of another person is not okay, I think you can agree on that. In terms of genetic ownership this would mean your parents still own you. And if you bring out the individuals right to their own life, again... the woman. A woman that has to alter her lifestyle, go through hormonal changes, go through 10 months of what can be anything from less than pleasant to hell in order to finally arrive at hours of excruciating pain that may include large tears being torn in her genitalia while she defecates in front of people and a possibility of long term issues with incontinence when she sneezes, laughs or coughs. Who gets a say on that?
And here is the issue. Women often go on the defence about this. There is so much more to a pregnancy than just baby grows and baby pops out that women do have a tendency to, instead of explaining why they believe their right trumps yours just say you cannot have a say because you are a man. It is an emotional issue. I get horrified just thinking about what a bio woman goes through during those 10 months including the culmination and the risk of long-term damage. We are talking about something that, unless we had such advanced medicine in our more modern societies, would mean a death sentence to a large percentage of women.
That makes women emotional. When humans get emotional we do simplify and overreact to "You are a man, you cannot get pregnant, you cannot have an abortion, you do not get a say in that" instead of rationally listing the problems with one genders attitude to the other genders right to have a medical procedure.
(At all times in this post "gender" refers to biological gender, even where not specified)
|
|
|
Post by EponaCapaill on Jul 8, 2013 23:50:20 GMT -11
From her point of view it can very well feel more like someone is infringing on the individuals right to have a medical procedure rather than sexism. Yes, pregnancy is bio gender specific. Yes, because of this so is abortion. Is it sexism? No. Is the decision to have a medical procedure up to the individual? Yes. Is it unfair? Hell yes. If I want to have a biological child I am forced to go through 10 months of my life belonging to someone else, my life being dictated by something else or I have to pay a surrogate and a fertilization clinic huge amounts of money and go through medical procedures. A man has to spurt in the right hole, or cup, at the right time. That is unfair. In terms of discussing something that biologically is a medical procedure only one biological gender can have done to them I do believe it is up to the people of the biological gender in question to have the voice on that. Having ones ethical beliefs extend to the individual rights of another person is not okay, I think you can agree on that. In terms of genetic ownership this would mean your parents still own you. And if you bring out the individuals right to their own life, again... the woman. A woman that has to alter her lifestyle, go through hormonal changes, go through 10 months of what can be anything from less than pleasant to hell in order to finally arrive at hours of excruciating pain that may include large tears being torn in her genitalia while she defecates in front of people and a possibility of long term issues with incontinence when she sneezes, laughs or coughs. Who gets a say on that? And here is the issue. Women often go on the defence about this. There is so much more to a pregnancy than just baby grows and baby pops out that women do have a tendency to, instead of explaining why they believe their right trumps yours just say you cannot have a say because you are a man. It is an emotional issue. I get horrified just thinking about what a bio woman goes through during those 10 months including the culmination and the risk of long-term damage. We are talking about something that, unless we had such advanced medicine in our more modern societies, would mean a death sentence to a large percentage of women. That makes women emotional. When humans get emotional we do simplify and overreact to "You are a man, you cannot get pregnant, you cannot have an abortion, you do not get a say in that" instead of rationally listing the problems with one genders attitude to the other genders right to have a medical procedure. (At all times in this post "gender" refers to biological gender, even where not specified) I wish I could "like" this post.
|
|
Memnoch
Moderators
Whoda Thunkit?
Posts: 204
|
Post by Memnoch on Jul 9, 2013 4:07:36 GMT -11
From her point of view it can very well feel more like someone is infringing on the individuals right to have a medical procedure rather than sexism. Yes, pregnancy is bio gender specific. Yes, because of this so is abortion. Is it sexism? No. Is the decision to have a medical procedure up to the individual? Yes. Is it unfair? Hell yes. If I want to have a biological child I am forced to go through 10 months of my life belonging to someone else, my life being dictated by something else or I have to pay a surrogate and a fertilization clinic huge amounts of money and go through medical procedures. A man has to spurt in the right hole, or cup, at the right time. That is unfair. In terms of discussing something that biologically is a medical procedure only one biological gender can have done to them I do believe it is up to the people of the biological gender in question to have the voice on that. Having ones ethical beliefs extend to the individual rights of another person is not okay, I think you can agree on that. In terms of genetic ownership this would mean your parents still own you. And if you bring out the individuals right to their own life, again... the woman. A woman that has to alter her lifestyle, go through hormonal changes, go through 10 months of what can be anything from less than pleasant to hell in order to finally arrive at hours of excruciating pain that may include large tears being torn in her genitalia while she defecates in front of people and a possibility of long term issues with incontinence when she sneezes, laughs or coughs. Who gets a say on that? And here is the issue. Women often go on the defence about this. There is so much more to a pregnancy than just baby grows and baby pops out that women do have a tendency to, instead of explaining why they believe their right trumps yours just say you cannot have a say because you are a man. It is an emotional issue. I get horrified just thinking about what a bio woman goes through during those 10 months including the culmination and the risk of long-term damage. We are talking about something that, unless we had such advanced medicine in our more modern societies, would mean a death sentence to a large percentage of women. That makes women emotional. When humans get emotional we do simplify and overreact to "You are a man, you cannot get pregnant, you cannot have an abortion, you do not get a say in that" instead of rationally listing the problems with one genders attitude to the other genders right to have a medical procedure. (At all times in this post "gender" refers to biological gender, even where not specified) I said nothing about having influence, making laws or anything else. However if a man isn't allowed to have an OPINION, that is sexism pure and simple. I would be the first person to complain if we were having a discussion about male circumcision, you, or any woman, stated your opinion, and a man said it doesn't matter what you think because you are a woman. Yet women talk about circumcision all of the time and no one gets up in arms. Again, I will point out that EVERY time I have seen this defense used it was when someone disagreed with a woman. You never hear a guy say he is pro choice and then a woman telling him to shut his piehole because he is a man and his thoughts don't matter. For that reason alone that argument is nothing more than an attempt to end a debate in which you have run out of patience or arguments.
|
|
Kalika
Junior Member
Rawr.
Posts: 106
|
Post by Kalika on Jul 9, 2013 4:28:40 GMT -11
Have you just asked her why she removed you... since I think that is your complaint even more so than your right to your particular stance? Sometimes the bridge isn't burnt, just splintered....FB unfriending is easy to do as a knee-jerk reaction, but it's also pretty easy to fix, if you want to. Also, I think Graphite said it very well.
|
|
|
Post by EponaCapaill on Jul 9, 2013 5:00:33 GMT -11
Yes, of course a man has a right to have an opinion about women's health issues, just as women have a right to have an opinion about men's health issues. You know what they say, "opinions are like a'holes, everyone has one." That doesn't mean that one gender should be able to decide for the other what is the best course of action regarding said issues.
Your friend most likely was upset because pregnancy and abortion, especially abortion, are emotionally charged issues. She probably doesn't mean that she thinks that men shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion (or maybe she does, I don't know her), but rather that men shouldn't be allowed to decide for her. I see it as a matter of semantics.
|
|
Memnoch
Moderators
Whoda Thunkit?
Posts: 204
|
Post by Memnoch on Jul 9, 2013 5:20:44 GMT -11
Have you just asked her why she removed you... since I think that is your complaint even more so than your right to your particular stance? Sometimes the bridge isn't burnt, just splintered....FB unfriending is easy to do as a knee-jerk reaction, but it's also pretty easy to fix, if you want to. Also, I think Graphite said it very well. That will be my course of action...but I will not have that discussion until I can remove the emotion from the discussion...and I haven't got to that point. Which goes into what Eponacapaill said, about the topic being emotionally charged. I'm sorry, but I believe if you can't set aside emotion and debate with logic and facts you shouldn't be debating. That is why there are a few issues I don't touch, including the abortion one, which is funny because the whole thing stemmed from her asking what good Ohio's governor has done (while she was complaining about the abortion law he signed)...I answered with a list of positive things he had done, it devolved from there, I deleted my posts and excused myself from the discussion after one of her friends stated that a man shouldn't have an opinion, and I followed it up about how I have no respect for those who have such a sexist view and that I will not debate them.
|
|
|
Post by EponaCapaill on Jul 9, 2013 5:28:50 GMT -11
I'm sorry, but I believe if you can't set aside emotion and debate with logic and facts you shouldn't be debating. Agreed, which is why I generally don't get involved in debates. I tend to be emotional. Also, I have difficulty keeping my thoughts straight sometimes. I'm easily distracted and once I'm distracted, I don't remember all of the awesome argument I was going to make, lol.
|
|
|
Post by tehmanagement on Jul 9, 2013 5:54:50 GMT -11
Memnoch, first of all, you rock, just needed to get that out of the way. Graphite I wish I could like your post. As for the topic at hand I think you have every right to be frustrated Mem even just on principle. More men should have a vocal opinion on abortion it's an important topic that goes beyond the body of the woman carrying the baby. I firmly believe that the father of the incumbent child should have at the very least a say in some kind of discussion or counseling about termination. Just because men only point and shoot so to speak doesn't mean the don't have some kind of feelings when the subject "I'm pregnant" comes up. That being said, an abortion saved my life. If there had been anyone; man, woman, child, or wookie that stood in my way of getting that thing out of me I would have cut a b*tch. Personally I see pregnancy as a disease, I don't want biological children of my own. However, if I got pregnant again and IF that was a viable pregnancy, I would at least hear my partner out if they felt differently. Granted when the hormones are raging it's a whole different kettle of fish, but I'd like to think that I wouldn't be a total asshat about it.
|
|
Kalika
Junior Member
Rawr.
Posts: 106
|
Post by Kalika on Jul 9, 2013 5:59:32 GMT -11
Have you just asked her why she removed you... since I think that is your complaint even more so than your right to your particular stance? Sometimes the bridge isn't burnt, just splintered....FB unfriending is easy to do as a knee-jerk reaction, but it's also pretty easy to fix, if you want to. Also, I think Graphite said it very well. That will be my course of action...but I will not have that discussion until I can remove the emotion from the discussion...and I haven't got to that point. Which goes into what Eponacapaill said, about the topic being emotionally charged. I'm sorry, but I believe if you can't set aside emotion and debate with logic and facts you shouldn't be debating. That is why there are a few issues I don't touch, including the abortion one, which is funny because the whole thing stemmed from her asking what good Ohio's governor has done (while she was complaining about the abortion law he signed)...I answered with a list of positive things he had done, it devolved from there, I deleted my posts and excused myself from the discussion after one of her friends stated that a man shouldn't have an opinion, and I followed it up about how I have no respect for those who have such a sexist view and that I will not debate them. Aw, see. I knew I liked you! Good luck!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 6:39:51 GMT -11
It is an emotionally charged topic. I think many women are rightly getting very defensive considering their rights have been under constant attack these days.
|
|
Memnoch
Moderators
Whoda Thunkit?
Posts: 204
|
Post by Memnoch on Jul 9, 2013 8:49:52 GMT -11
Thanks everyone. Hawk, your opinion doesn't count, you're a guy
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 13:02:41 GMT -11
LOL!
|
|
Graphite
Moderators
The Big Bad
Trimming fat
Posts: 453
|
Post by Graphite on Jul 9, 2013 14:02:13 GMT -11
All I am saying is that not everything on facebook is meant to be a debate, and if it happened there it may just as well have been her venting frustration about a politician that is doing something a lot of people will get emotional about. A lot of people do it, including you and I and then things get into a huge tiff from there.
The question is, was it already a debate when you got involved, or was it venting? You do have a skill for turning things on their edge, and to a lot of onlookers who do not know you this can seem highly antagonistic. Same as my husband.
One way of getting rid of some of the emotion and resolving the issue is to flip the situation and look at it from the opposite perspective while also considering ones own role in the matter.
The question is, are you angry with your friend for not standing up for you? Are you angry at your friend for agreeing with another friend in an emotional situation? A lot of women are of the notion that if you do not have a uterus, get out of it. I understand this is a huge issue for a lot of women who do face things such as the possibility of harassment, false abortion clinics, and male legislators and religious leaders having control over their reproductive organs. It is emotional. I have been lucky enough never to be in the position of needing or even needing to consider an abortion, because if I did I would be terrified for all of the above reasons.
While we are all supposed to be rational we have to consider this. While others are allowed to voice their opinion in how depression and anxiety is really just a case of moping, being blue and needing to pull ones self up by their own bootstraps I would not trust their opinion of it unless they are: 1. A person who has lived through it. 2. A person who is educated in the issue (psychologist)
And I would definitely not let their opinion hold much water if they were physically and medically incapable of even ever suffering from depression and anxiety.
It is kind of like letting a person with CIP have a say regarding pain management.
That is how a lot of women think regarding abortion. It is like listening to people with CIP going on and on about how pain should be managed in the rest of the population.
|
|
Memnoch
Moderators
Whoda Thunkit?
Posts: 204
|
Post by Memnoch on Jul 9, 2013 14:24:18 GMT -11
All I am saying is that not everything on facebook is meant to be a debate, and if it happened there it may just as well have been her venting frustration about a politician that is doing something a lot of people will get emotional about. A lot of people do it, including you and I and then things get into a huge tiff from there. The question is, was it already a debate when you got involved, or was it venting? You do have a skill for turning things on their edge, and to a lot of onlookers who do not know you this can seem highly antagonistic. Same as my husband. One way of getting rid of some of the emotion and resolving the issue is to flip the situation and look at it from the opposite perspective while also considering ones own role in the matter. The question is, are you angry with your friend for not standing up for you? Are you angry at your friend for agreeing with another friend in an emotional situation? A lot of women are of the notion that if you do not have a uterus, get out of it. I understand this is a huge issue for a lot of women who do face things such as the possibility of harassment, false abortion clinics, and male legislators and religious leaders having control over their reproductive organs. It is emotional. I have been lucky enough never to be in the position of needing or even needing to consider an abortion, because if I did I would be terrified for all of the above reasons. While we are all supposed to be rational we have to consider this. While others are allowed to voice their opinion in how depression and anxiety is really just a case of moping, being blue and needing to pull ones self up by their own bootstraps I would not trust their opinion of it unless they are: 1. A person who has lived through it. 2. A person who is educated in the issue (psychologist) And I would definitely not let their opinion hold much water if they were physically and medically incapable of even ever suffering from depression and anxiety. It is kind of like letting a person with CIP have a say regarding pain management. That is how a lot of women think regarding abortion. It is like listening to people with CIP going on and on about how pain should be managed in the rest of the population. The reality are there are 3 possibilities. I came in to her post, commented on something unrelated to the topic, and was attacked, so I attacked. My attack could have offended her. I then essentially walked out of the topic when it got to heated, pointing out how I found the argument to be sexist. However she responded after that, she didn't defriend me then, it wasn't until later, after I posted, on my own page, how such sexist arguments are one reason I would defriend someone. I assume that was the reason, and part of my eventual confrontation will be to know for certain. Which leads to another point, who I am upset at and why...I'm not upset at anyone. I am hurt and insulted by her actions. No matter the reason I felt that we were/are close enough that she would have respected me enough to tell me she was defriending me, and why. Then, if my assumptions are right I'm disappointed in her. I always respected her because I felt she was willing to consider other opinions. I then start thinking back on past discussions on her FB page that got out of control...she sided with another friend because she agreed with her (no biggie), the attacks got personal, and she scolded me while saying it is both of are faults. She asked me to tone it down, and clarified that didn't mean not to be silent. I'm starting to think to how I was her only friend that would have an opinion different than hers, or at least express it...it makes me wonder if she is one of those people who truly wants to live in an echo chamber. Granted, much of this is based on assumption, but if that assumption is right, I don't know if I would have any respect left for her...and that upsets me.
|
|
Graphite
Moderators
The Big Bad
Trimming fat
Posts: 453
|
Post by Graphite on Jul 9, 2013 14:35:25 GMT -11
She may have defriended you because she believed that remark mean she was about to be defriended, so to speak. Some people would rather be the one doing the defriending than being the defriended.
I would expect that if you have a sane and quiet conversation about the situation it will probably be rife with misunderstandings on both sides.
It sounds like two passionate people discussing an emotional subject and misunderstanding each other.
|
|